Real-time monitoring across 30+ jurisdictions. Track every regulatory change, enforcement action, and emerging AI law worldwide.
28
Changes Tracked
30+
Jurisdictions Monitored
25
Frameworks Covered
New Jersey A4544 would regulate automated decision-making systems used by state agencies and large private entities. The bill requires impact assessments prior to deployment, ongoing auditing for discriminatory outcomes, public disclosure of system capabilities and limitations, and consumer access to human review of automated decisions. Covers employment, credit, insurance, and government benefit determinations.
Massachusetts SD 1372 would establish a comprehensive AI governance framework requiring organizations deploying high-risk AI systems to conduct algorithmic impact assessments, implement bias testing protocols, and maintain human oversight mechanisms. The bill targets AI used in employment screening, lending decisions, healthcare triage, and criminal justice risk assessment. It would create an AI Advisory Council to develop technical standards.
Virginia HB 2094 would impose duties on developers and deployers of high-risk AI systems operating in Virginia. Developers must provide model documentation, share bias testing results, and disclose known limitations to downstream deployers. Deployers must implement risk management programs, conduct impact assessments, and maintain records for audit purposes. The bill aligns closely with the NIST AI RMF governance framework and the Colorado AI Act.
New York S7623 expands the existing NYC Local Law 144 (automated employment decision tools) statewide and broadens its scope beyond employment to include housing, lending, and insurance decisions. The expansion requires annual bias audits by independent auditors, published audit summaries, candidate/consumer notification prior to AI-assisted evaluation, and an alternative assessment process for individuals who opt out of automated evaluation.
Connecticut SB 2 proposes accountability requirements for AI systems used in consequential decisions affecting Connecticut residents. The bill would require deployers to conduct impact assessments, implement governance frameworks, provide consumer transparency notices, and establish appeal processes. It follows a similar structure to the Colorado AI Act and covers employment, lending, insurance, housing, and educational decisions.
Deep-dive into the frameworks that matter to your organization
Get the AI Compliance Dispatch delivered every Monday. Momentum scores, contagion predictions, and enforcement updates from 30+ jurisdictions.
Display a verified compliance badge on your website.
Register your AI systems and get automated risk classification, cross-framework assessments, and audit-ready documentation.
Govern, Map, Measure, Manage functions